Sultanpur7 minutes ago
- copy link
Advocates had recommended the inspector in the court.
Barabanki’s Dariyabad SO Durga Prasad Shukla was so negligent in the testimony of the case of molestation and culpable homicide that he may have to go to jail. Fearing court proceedings, he suddenly disappeared from court custody after the warrant recall application was rejected on Tuesday evening and appeared arbitrarily on Wednesday. While he was reprimanded, there was a round of recommendations of many officers and others of the department. Due to wrong lobbying, people had to listen a lot from the court.
In the end, the court of Judge Pawan Kumar Sharma, after the completion of the arguments of the investigator in the case, accepted the warrant recall application presented again on behalf of the Inspector, after much persuasion, with a solemn warning not to repeat such mistake in future. At the same time, the role of the police department is still negotiable on the discussion of the FIR regarding the unlawful disappearance from the court custody.
File photo of SHO DP Shukla.
lambhua kotwali region From connected Is Case
The matter is related to a village of Lambhua Kotwali. Where about 4 years ago, some youths had harassed a schoolgirl and mounted their bike on her. In which the girl died during treatment. The police had filed a charge sheet against the accused youth Pradeep and others on other charges including molestation and culpable homicide. At that time the charge of Lambhua police station was with Durga Prasad Shukla who had investigated the case. That’s why he has been made a witness.
CO had reached the court with the team.
june In recorded got it done was Statement
In this case, DP Shukla had recorded his main statement on June 6 in the Special POCSO Act Court of the District Court. But on the three subsequent appearances, he remained absent from the cross-examination proceedings even after the process continued from the court. Therefore, the court had issued a non-bailable warrant.
According to the order of the court, Durga Prasad Shukla reached the POCSO court at around 4.30 pm on Tuesday. Prior to this, he remained in touch with the public prosecutor and others on mobile throughout the day and continued to refuse to reach the court.
Due to these negligence of the investigator, the Special Judge dismissed the warrant recall application presented by Durga Prasad Shukla considering it not appropriate to accept at that time and directed to keep him in judicial custody and produce him in the court at 10.30 am on Wednesday. Had given.
Daroga’s advocate Arvind Singh Raja returns from the judge’s chamber.
court has put Was Damnation
But instead of staying in judicial custody, Chur Durga Prasad Shukla, who was in his uniform, kept walking from there. But after a while the matter took hold, then instead of judicial custody, Durga Prasad came under the supervision of the police of the district headquarters. On Wednesday morning, with the intention of covering up his mistake, he appeared in the court before 10.30 am.
When his case was presented before the judge, Durga Prasad Shukla became unanswered on the questions of the court and his speaking stopped. Even the court asked Durga Prasad Shukla what do you guys do on such a mistake, then he could not give any answer. The angry court had told him to file a case through the court seal and even take contempt proceedings.
Advocate Rajesh Pandey of the plaintiff.
family Of troubles of Gave hawala
After this tough stand of the court, there was a stir in the police department. Everyone had to hear unnecessary reprimands due to the negligence of their department’s inspector and got disappointed. After much effort, the cross-examination of SO Durga Prasad Shukla started in the trial and continued till it was completed.
The court, through the discriminant, conditionally accepted the warrant recall application presented by him again with a stern warning on the condition of not repeating such mistake in future. According to the information received, SO Durga Prasad Shukla made a lot of requests by telling the court about the personal and physical problems of his family regarding the warrant recall, then the court released him with a warning.